<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 858 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770586</link>
    <description>An unpaid arbitral award that has attained finality can crystallise a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and non-payment constitutes default. The corporate debtor&#039;s objections about machinery supply, changed specifications, and alleged third-party breaches did not negate the debt owed to the financial creditor, because the financing arrangement, supporting documents, and charge registration were undisputed and the award liability had been affirmed after the Section 34 challenge failed. On that basis, admission into the corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 7 was sustained and the insolvency commencement order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 14:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 858 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770586</link>
      <description>An unpaid arbitral award that has attained finality can crystallise a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and non-payment constitutes default. The corporate debtor&#039;s objections about machinery supply, changed specifications, and alleged third-party breaches did not negate the debt owed to the financial creditor, because the financing arrangement, supporting documents, and charge registration were undisputed and the award liability had been affirmed after the Section 34 challenge failed. On that basis, admission into the corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 7 was sustained and the insolvency commencement order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>