<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770608</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding additions for estimated cash sales of gold and silver during demonetization period and interest payments treated as unexplained expenditure under section 69C. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions, ruling that since assessee had properly reflected actual cash and credit sales in profit and loss account and income tax return, any additional estimates would constitute double addition. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the contested additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770608</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding additions for estimated cash sales of gold and silver during demonetization period and interest payments treated as unexplained expenditure under section 69C. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions, ruling that since assessee had properly reflected actual cash and credit sales in profit and loss account and income tax return, any additional estimates would constitute double addition. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the contested additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>