<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 910 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770638</link>
    <description>HC admitted writ petition challenging GST notice on brand owner&#039;s economic surplus. Court found prima facie merit in petitioner&#039;s argument that surplus constitutes business profit, not taxable service, based on 2009 Revenue Circular. Granted limited interim relief by allowing response to show cause notice while restraining authorities from passing final order without court permission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 910 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770638</link>
      <description>HC admitted writ petition challenging GST notice on brand owner&#039;s economic surplus. Court found prima facie merit in petitioner&#039;s argument that surplus constitutes business profit, not taxable service, based on 2009 Revenue Circular. Granted limited interim relief by allowing response to show cause notice while restraining authorities from passing final order without court permission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>