<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461988</link>
    <description>Non-adjudication of a raised ground and connected sub-grounds in an appellate order was treated as a mistake apparent from the record under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The omission was held rectifiable because the issues had been specifically raised but not decided. The earlier order was recalled for the limited purpose of adjudicating Ground No. 4 and the connected sub-grounds, and the rectification application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 19:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461988</link>
      <description>Non-adjudication of a raised ground and connected sub-grounds in an appellate order was treated as a mistake apparent from the record under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The omission was held rectifiable because the issues had been specifically raised but not decided. The earlier order was recalled for the limited purpose of adjudicating Ground No. 4 and the connected sub-grounds, and the rectification application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>