<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1739 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461991</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata held that reopening notice u/s 148 issued by non-jurisdictional AO rendered the assessment invalid. Following SC precedent in Hotel Blue Moon case, the tribunal ruled that jurisdictional AO issuing notice u/s 148 is sine qua non for valid reopening proceedings u/s 147. Since notice was issued by AO lacking jurisdiction over assessee, it was treated as non-est. Assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was quashed as bad in law. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 15:17:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1739 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461991</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata held that reopening notice u/s 148 issued by non-jurisdictional AO rendered the assessment invalid. Following SC precedent in Hotel Blue Moon case, the tribunal ruled that jurisdictional AO issuing notice u/s 148 is sine qua non for valid reopening proceedings u/s 147. Since notice was issued by AO lacking jurisdiction over assessee, it was treated as non-est. Assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was quashed as bad in law. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>