https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461994 In a second bail application arising from an alleged offence under Section 132 of the CGST Act, the Allahabad HC held that the earlier rejection on merits remained relevant and that the alleged conduct constituted a serious economic offence affecting the national economy. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to enlarge the applicant on bail and refused bail. The direction for expeditious trial was only ancillary and did not affect the custody decision. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 May 2025 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461994 In a second bail application arising from an alleged offence under Section 132 of the CGST Act, the Allahabad HC held that the earlier rejection on merits remained relevant and that the alleged conduct constituted a serious economic offence affecting the national economy. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to enlarge the applicant on bail and refused bail. The direction for expeditious trial was only ancillary and did not affect the custody decision. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461994