<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43617</link>
    <description>Promissory estoppel was available against supersession of a statutory customs-duty exemption notification issued for a stated period. The issue had already been resolved in favour of the appellants, and no affidavit raised the further question whether equitable considerations should deny the estoppel. Customs duty was therefore required to be levied at the rate prescribed by the earlier notification, with refund of excess duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:50:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43617</link>
      <description>Promissory estoppel was available against supersession of a statutory customs-duty exemption notification issued for a stated period. The issue had already been resolved in favour of the appellants, and no affidavit raised the further question whether equitable considerations should deny the estoppel. Customs duty was therefore required to be levied at the rate prescribed by the earlier notification, with refund of excess duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>