https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43614 The High Court directed respondent No. 2 to verify and grant the refund claim to petitioners, with interest, under a writ petition. Despite an amendment to the Central Excise Act, respondent No. 2 failed to comply, arguing release from honoring the writ. The Division Bench's refusal to pass orders on respondent's motion was final. The court found respondent No. 2 in disobedience of the writ, rejecting arguments of absolution under the amendment. The court directed the refund amount's deposit within a week, reserving contempt action pending compliance. en-us Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:43:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43614 The High Court directed respondent No. 2 to verify and grant the refund claim to petitioners, with interest, under a writ petition. Despite an amendment to the Central Excise Act, respondent No. 2 failed to comply, arguing release from honoring the writ. The Division Bench's refusal to pass orders on respondent's motion was final. The court found respondent No. 2 in disobedience of the writ, rejecting arguments of absolution under the amendment. The court directed the refund amount's deposit within a week, reserving contempt action pending compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43614