<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43610</link>
    <description>An import licence endorsement for OGL items could not validate beef tallow imported after the commodity had been canalised under the Import Policy 1982-83. The applicable import restriction prevailed, so confiscation under the Customs Act was sustained. Relief in writ jurisdiction to reduce the redemption fine was also refused on the facts stated. The petition was dismissed, leaving the confiscation order and redemption fine undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43610</link>
      <description>An import licence endorsement for OGL items could not validate beef tallow imported after the commodity had been canalised under the Import Policy 1982-83. The applicable import restriction prevailed, so confiscation under the Customs Act was sustained. Relief in writ jurisdiction to reduce the redemption fine was also refused on the facts stated. The petition was dismissed, leaving the confiscation order and redemption fine undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>