<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 833 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770561</link>
    <description>Compliance with the statutory notice requirement under the Income-tax Act was treated as mandatory in reassessment proceedings, and non-issuance or invalid service of the jurisdictional notice was not a mere procedural irregularity. The Court noted that the reassessment framework under Sections 147, 148 and the notice requirement under Section 143(2), read with the jurisdictional scheme under Sections 2(7A) and 120 and the faceless assessment provisions under Section 144B, must be followed validly. Section 292BB did not cure the defect where the assessee had raised a timely objection. The Tribunal was therefore right in holding the reassessment order invalid, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 09:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 833 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770561</link>
      <description>Compliance with the statutory notice requirement under the Income-tax Act was treated as mandatory in reassessment proceedings, and non-issuance or invalid service of the jurisdictional notice was not a mere procedural irregularity. The Court noted that the reassessment framework under Sections 147, 148 and the notice requirement under Section 143(2), read with the jurisdictional scheme under Sections 2(7A) and 120 and the faceless assessment provisions under Section 144B, must be followed validly. Section 292BB did not cure the defect where the assessee had raised a timely objection. The Tribunal was therefore right in holding the reassessment order invalid, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>