https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770570 The Calcutta HC granted interim protection against a GST demand and adjudication where the challenge centered on the validity of notifications extending limitation under Section 168A and the alleged absence of force majeure for issuing the notice and order for the relevant tax period. Treating the dispute as jurisdictional, the Court found a prima facie case for interim relief and noted that a coordinate Bench had already passed a limited interim order in an identical matter. The impugned demand was stayed until the end of December 2025 or until further order, and the writ petition was directed to proceed on affidavits. en-us Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770570 The Calcutta HC granted interim protection against a GST demand and adjudication where the challenge centered on the validity of notifications extending limitation under Section 168A and the alleged absence of force majeure for issuing the notice and order for the relevant tax period. Treating the dispute as jurisdictional, the Court found a prima facie case for interim relief and noted that a coordinate Bench had already passed a limited interim order in an identical matter. The impugned demand was stayed until the end of December 2025 or until further order, and the writ petition was directed to proceed on affidavits. Case-Laws GST Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770570