<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2130 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461982</link>
    <description>Computation of income and notional interest on excess money invested were treated as settled issues under Bombay High Court precedent. The court noted that the income-computation question was already concluded by its earlier decision in M/s. PMP Auto Components Pvt. Ltd., following Vodafone Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, and therefore did not raise a substantial question of law. It also recorded that the notional-interest issue, framed as opportunity cost and uncontrolled-transaction recovery, had already been decided in favour of the assessee in M/s. Aegis Limited. Both proposed questions were therefore not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 19:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2130 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461982</link>
      <description>Computation of income and notional interest on excess money invested were treated as settled issues under Bombay High Court precedent. The court noted that the income-computation question was already concluded by its earlier decision in M/s. PMP Auto Components Pvt. Ltd., following Vodafone Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, and therefore did not raise a substantial question of law. It also recorded that the notional-interest issue, framed as opportunity cost and uncontrolled-transaction recovery, had already been decided in favour of the assessee in M/s. Aegis Limited. Both proposed questions were therefore not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>