https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43585 A fiscal benefit already granted under a Chapter X notification could not be withdrawn to the prejudice of the affected party without prior hearing, because the withdrawal had civil consequences and had to comply with natural justice. The High Court found that the impugned order did not disclose that the petitioners had been given an opportunity to be heard before the facility in relation to ball-bearings and roller-bearings was taken away. The withdrawal order was therefore quashed, and reconsideration was permitted only after affording the petitioners a hearing. en-us Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:41:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43585 A fiscal benefit already granted under a Chapter X notification could not be withdrawn to the prejudice of the affected party without prior hearing, because the withdrawal had civil consequences and had to comply with natural justice. The High Court found that the impugned order did not disclose that the petitioners had been given an opportunity to be heard before the facility in relation to ball-bearings and roller-bearings was taken away. The withdrawal order was therefore quashed, and reconsideration was permitted only after affording the petitioners a hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43585