<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 754 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770482</link>
    <description>The reassessment regime amended by the Finance Act, 2021 required prior approval under section 151 to be tested against the provision in force on the date sanction was granted. The Delhi HC held that the time extension under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 did not alter the statutory hierarchy of sanction. Where more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, approval had to come from the authority specified in clause (ii); the notice under section 148, the order under section 148A(d), and the consequential demand were issued without the requisite approval and beyond the permissible time, and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 754 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770482</link>
      <description>The reassessment regime amended by the Finance Act, 2021 required prior approval under section 151 to be tested against the provision in force on the date sanction was granted. The Delhi HC held that the time extension under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 did not alter the statutory hierarchy of sanction. Where more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, approval had to come from the authority specified in clause (ii); the notice under section 148, the order under section 148A(d), and the consequential demand were issued without the requisite approval and beyond the permissible time, and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>