https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770489 A writ petition challenging a final order under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 174(2) of the CGST Act, was not entertained because an effective alternative remedy existed under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The High Court noted that the matter had already culminated in a final order and that the writ jurisdiction should not be invoked in the face of the statutory remedy. The petition was disposed of on maintainability grounds, while the Court observed that the petitioner should not be left remediless given the pendency of the matter before the Court. en-us Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770489 A writ petition challenging a final order under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 174(2) of the CGST Act, was not entertained because an effective alternative remedy existed under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The High Court noted that the matter had already culminated in a final order and that the writ jurisdiction should not be invoked in the face of the statutory remedy. The petition was disposed of on maintainability grounds, while the Court observed that the petitioner should not be left remediless given the pendency of the matter before the Court. Case-Laws GST Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770489