<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 767 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770495</link>
    <description>Section 75(7) of the GST Act bars an adjudicating authority from confirming tax, interest or penalty beyond the amount stated in the show-cause notice or on grounds not set out in that notice. The impugned demand exceeded the notice amount and relied on grounds not covered by it, so it was inconsistent with the statutory limit. The Allahabad HC allowed the writ petition and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after response and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 09:01:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=821100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 767 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770495</link>
      <description>Section 75(7) of the GST Act bars an adjudicating authority from confirming tax, interest or penalty beyond the amount stated in the show-cause notice or on grounds not set out in that notice. The impugned demand exceeded the notice amount and relied on grounds not covered by it, so it was inconsistent with the statutory limit. The Allahabad HC allowed the writ petition and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after response and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>