https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43574 The earlier import policy did not confer any automatic extension for imports made between 1 April 1983 and 15 April 1983 after expiry of the 1982-83 policy. Although the petitioners had obtained an additional licence and had taken steps to import before expiry, neither the public notice, any notification, nor the 1983-84 policy extended the licence period expressly. In the absence of such express provision, the petitioners could not claim the benefit of the earlier policy for the interregnum, and the confiscation challenge failed. en-us Thu, 24 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:18:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43574 The earlier import policy did not confer any automatic extension for imports made between 1 April 1983 and 15 April 1983 after expiry of the 1982-83 policy. Although the petitioners had obtained an additional licence and had taken steps to import before expiry, neither the public notice, any notification, nor the 1983-84 policy extended the licence period expressly. In the absence of such express provision, the petitioners could not claim the benefit of the earlier policy for the interregnum, and the confiscation challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43574