<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43570</link>
    <description>The Court determined that blending of ore during loading into the ship constituted &quot;processing&quot; but not &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 8(3)(b) and Rule 13. It held that the entire operation from mining to loading formed an integrated process, making items used in any phase eligible for inclusion in the Certificate of Registration. Goods used in transporting ore were considered part of the processing operation. The Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing re-examination of disputed items by the Sales Tax Officer and dismissing the Union of India&#039;s appeal. The Revenue was ordered to pay the assessee&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43570</link>
      <description>The Court determined that blending of ore during loading into the ship constituted &quot;processing&quot; but not &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 8(3)(b) and Rule 13. It held that the entire operation from mining to loading formed an integrated process, making items used in any phase eligible for inclusion in the Certificate of Registration. Goods used in transporting ore were considered part of the processing operation. The Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing re-examination of disputed items by the Sales Tax Officer and dismissing the Union of India&#039;s appeal. The Revenue was ordered to pay the assessee&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>