<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770374</link>
    <description>Appellate court examined service tax applicability on electricity reimbursement charges. SC invalidated Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules as ultra vires, finding it exceeded statutory limits. Tribunal determined electricity charges constitute sale of goods, not taxable service. Consequently, the court set aside service tax, interest, and penalty demands, ruling the original orders unsustainable and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770374</link>
      <description>Appellate court examined service tax applicability on electricity reimbursement charges. SC invalidated Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules as ultra vires, finding it exceeded statutory limits. Tribunal determined electricity charges constitute sale of goods, not taxable service. Consequently, the court set aside service tax, interest, and penalty demands, ruling the original orders unsustainable and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>