<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 653 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770381</link>
    <description>Section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires an authorised officer to record reasons to believe, follow the prescribed search, seizure and freezing procedure, and forward the recorded reasons and material to the Adjudicating Authority. The Orissa HC noted that no nexus was established between the petitioner-company, its BMW car or its bank account and the alleged proceeds of crime, and the record did not show compliance with the statutory safeguards. As the car was financed and the account reflected business funds, the seizure and freezing were treated as mechanical and without authority of law. The seizure and freezing were held illegal and unsustainable, and relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 653 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770381</link>
      <description>Section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires an authorised officer to record reasons to believe, follow the prescribed search, seizure and freezing procedure, and forward the recorded reasons and material to the Adjudicating Authority. The Orissa HC noted that no nexus was established between the petitioner-company, its BMW car or its bank account and the alleged proceeds of crime, and the record did not show compliance with the statutory safeguards. As the car was financed and the account reflected business funds, the seizure and freezing were treated as mechanical and without authority of law. The seizure and freezing were held illegal and unsustainable, and relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>