<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43563</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the applicability of Sections 59, 60, and 61 of the Customs Act to goods warehoused under Section 85. It validated the interest demand under Section 61(2) as compensatory, not penal, and found it constitutional under Article 19 of the Constitution of India. The court denied the petitioners&#039; request for interim relief and discharged the rule with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43563</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the applicability of Sections 59, 60, and 61 of the Customs Act to goods warehoused under Section 85. It validated the interest demand under Section 61(2) as compensatory, not penal, and found it constitutional under Article 19 of the Constitution of India. The court denied the petitioners&#039; request for interim relief and discharged the rule with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>