https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43562 A writ directing refund of duty remains binding until varied or stayed in the same proceedings, and a stay in another matter does not suspend compliance. The text notes that Section 11B, introduced after the extended compliance period had already expired, could not be invoked to excuse non-compliance where no variation of the existing order was sought. It further states that failure to refund even the admitted amount, coupled with continued resistance to compliance, was treated as wilful disobedience supporting contempt, and that later reliance on Section 11B did not cure a default already committed after expiry of the court-fixed time. en-us Fri, 25 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:39:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43562 A writ directing refund of duty remains binding until varied or stayed in the same proceedings, and a stay in another matter does not suspend compliance. The text notes that Section 11B, introduced after the extended compliance period had already expired, could not be invoked to excuse non-compliance where no variation of the existing order was sought. It further states that failure to refund even the admitted amount, coupled with continued resistance to compliance, was treated as wilful disobedience supporting contempt, and that later reliance on Section 11B did not cure a default already committed after expiry of the court-fixed time. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43562