<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 673 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770401</link>
    <description>The SC resolved a complex dispute involving gold confiscation, determining that the Customs Department&#039;s 2000 confiscation order vested ownership in the Central Government, superseding prior claims by MMTC and Indian Bank. Upon MMTC&#039;s payment of customs duties and penalties, the Court ordered gold restoration to MMTC, effectively nullifying competing first charge claims by rejecting the banks&#039; priority arguments based on the overriding statutory confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 673 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770401</link>
      <description>The SC resolved a complex dispute involving gold confiscation, determining that the Customs Department&#039;s 2000 confiscation order vested ownership in the Central Government, superseding prior claims by MMTC and Indian Bank. Upon MMTC&#039;s payment of customs duties and penalties, the Court ordered gold restoration to MMTC, effectively nullifying competing first charge claims by rejecting the banks&#039; priority arguments based on the overriding statutory confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>