https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770417 ITAT Mumbai remitted matter back to AO for verification regarding income discrepancy of Rs. 28,68,699. Assessee explained the difference arose from credit from Orbit Construction and demonstrated that AO's addition of Rs. 66,02,464 was exactly twice the gross amount of Rs. 33,01,232 appearing in Form 26AS. Both AO and CIT(A) failed to objectively consider assessee's detailed submissions and explanations. ITAT found authorities below did not act responsibly in accordance with law provisions. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with direction to AO to verify assessee's claim and pass appropriate order. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 10:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770417 ITAT Mumbai remitted matter back to AO for verification regarding income discrepancy of Rs. 28,68,699. Assessee explained the difference arose from credit from Orbit Construction and demonstrated that AO's addition of Rs. 66,02,464 was exactly twice the gross amount of Rs. 33,01,232 appearing in Form 26AS. Both AO and CIT(A) failed to objectively consider assessee's detailed submissions and explanations. ITAT found authorities below did not act responsibly in accordance with law provisions. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with direction to AO to verify assessee's claim and pass appropriate order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770417