<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770421</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the final assessment order passed under sections 143(3), 144C(13), and 144B involving transfer pricing adjustments under section 92CA(3). The tribunal confirmed the adjustment made with a revised margin of 3.32% following the DRP&#039;s direction. The assessee failed to rebut the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings with evidence before the tribunal. Consequently, the ITAT found no infirmity in the assessment order and rejected all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 11:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770421</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the final assessment order passed under sections 143(3), 144C(13), and 144B involving transfer pricing adjustments under section 92CA(3). The tribunal confirmed the adjustment made with a revised margin of 3.32% following the DRP&#039;s direction. The assessee failed to rebut the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings with evidence before the tribunal. Consequently, the ITAT found no infirmity in the assessment order and rejected all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>