<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43559</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition filed by a private limited company seeking to substitute a bill of entry for home consumption with one for warehousing due to changes in duty rates. The court held that the mere filing for warehousing does not automatically allow substitution for home consumption, emphasizing that duty rates are determined based on the bill of entry presented. It was found that allowing substitution would prejudice revenue interests by enabling the petitioners to benefit from lower duty rates. The Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to deny substitution was upheld, and costs were awarded to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43559</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition filed by a private limited company seeking to substitute a bill of entry for home consumption with one for warehousing due to changes in duty rates. The court held that the mere filing for warehousing does not automatically allow substitution for home consumption, emphasizing that duty rates are determined based on the bill of entry presented. It was found that allowing substitution would prejudice revenue interests by enabling the petitioners to benefit from lower duty rates. The Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to deny substitution was upheld, and costs were awarded to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>