<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 700 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770428</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur (AT) allowed the appeal and held that a registered trust is entitled to exemption under s.11 even though its ITR was filed belatedly, provided it was submitted within the time limit prescribed by s.139(4). The Tribunal relied on CBDT circulars (including F. No.173/193/2019-ITA-1 and Circular No.6/2020) and earlier HC authority concluding that a return filed within s.139(4) is to be treated as timely for the purposes of s.11. The AO&#039;s objection based solely on late filing under s.139(1) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 700 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770428</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur (AT) allowed the appeal and held that a registered trust is entitled to exemption under s.11 even though its ITR was filed belatedly, provided it was submitted within the time limit prescribed by s.139(4). The Tribunal relied on CBDT circulars (including F. No.173/193/2019-ITA-1 and Circular No.6/2020) and earlier HC authority concluding that a return filed within s.139(4) is to be treated as timely for the purposes of s.11. The AO&#039;s objection based solely on late filing under s.139(1) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>