<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 712 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal analyzed a case involving penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act for underreporting of income. It found the penalty unjustified due to the tax consultant&#039;s fraudulent actions, the assessee&#039;s bona fide conduct, and voluntary tax payment before notice issuance. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, emphasizing that deliberate misreporting was absent and the assessee acted transparently throughout the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 712 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal analyzed a case involving penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act for underreporting of income. It found the penalty unjustified due to the tax consultant&#039;s fraudulent actions, the assessee&#039;s bona fide conduct, and voluntary tax payment before notice issuance. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, emphasizing that deliberate misreporting was absent and the assessee acted transparently throughout the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>