<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770444</link>
    <description>Delhi HC allowed petition challenging CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of condonation application for one-month delay in filing Form 10B for trust assessment. Court held that where genuine hardship is established, the authority must exercise its discretionary power to condone delay. HC found CIT(E) erroneously concluded the delay lacked reasonable cause despite established mitigating circumstances. CIT(E) was directed to issue appropriate order condoning the thirty-day delay for AY 2022-23.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 13:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770444</link>
      <description>Delhi HC allowed petition challenging CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of condonation application for one-month delay in filing Form 10B for trust assessment. Court held that where genuine hardship is established, the authority must exercise its discretionary power to condone delay. HC found CIT(E) erroneously concluded the delay lacked reasonable cause despite established mitigating circumstances. CIT(E) was directed to issue appropriate order condoning the thirty-day delay for AY 2022-23.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>