https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43557 The court held that the 2nd respondent was estopped from demanding excise duty after committing to withdraw the appeal, causing the petitioner to pay. The court quashed the demand, allowing the writ petition. Despite having the authority to review the stand, the 2nd respondent was estopped from retracting the commitment made in writing. The impugned demand was quashed, ruling in favor of the petitioner, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43557 The court held that the 2nd respondent was estopped from demanding excise duty after committing to withdraw the appeal, causing the petitioner to pay. The court quashed the demand, allowing the writ petition. Despite having the authority to review the stand, the 2nd respondent was estopped from retracting the commitment made in writing. The impugned demand was quashed, ruling in favor of the petitioner, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43557