<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 727 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770455</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged the levy of GST on transfer of development rights under a revenue sharing arrangement and sought interim protection pending adjudication. The HC found arguable questions on the GST levy and granted interim relief by restraining the respondents from acting further on the impugned order dated 27 January 2025. Rule was issued, pleadings were directed by way of affidavit-in-reply and affidavit-in-rejoinder, and the petition was tagged with a connected matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 727 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770455</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged the levy of GST on transfer of development rights under a revenue sharing arrangement and sought interim protection pending adjudication. The HC found arguable questions on the GST levy and granted interim relief by restraining the respondents from acting further on the impugned order dated 27 January 2025. Rule was issued, pleadings were directed by way of affidavit-in-reply and affidavit-in-rejoinder, and the petition was tagged with a connected matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>