https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461940 Contempt jurisdiction under Article 215 and the Contempt of Courts Act remained recognised, but the High Court treated itself as bound by judicial propriety to respect the Supreme Court's stay of the contempt proceedings. The discussion distinguished the High Court's contempt powers from the Supreme Court's appellate and special leave jurisdiction under Articles 132 to 136, and treated the stay as preventing further progress in the pending matter. The contempt proceedings were adjourned sine die until the connected special leave petition is decided. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 19:11:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461940 Contempt jurisdiction under Article 215 and the Contempt of Courts Act remained recognised, but the High Court treated itself as bound by judicial propriety to respect the Supreme Court's stay of the contempt proceedings. The discussion distinguished the High Court's contempt powers from the Supreme Court's appellate and special leave jurisdiction under Articles 132 to 136, and treated the stay as preventing further progress in the pending matter. The contempt proceedings were adjourned sine die until the connected special leave petition is decided. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461940