<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 126 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43551</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny small-scale exemption requires material showing mutuality of business interest, common funding or financial flow-back; mere proximity of units, family relationship or some common operational features is insufficient. On the face of the notice and record, the petitioner&#039;s unit had separate registration, a separately approved rental arrangement, an excise licence, its own bank account, electricity arrangements and regular RT-12 returns. As the proposed clubbing lacked jurisdictional basis and supporting material, the show cause notice was quashed and the petitioner was held entitled to exemption in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 126 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43551</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny small-scale exemption requires material showing mutuality of business interest, common funding or financial flow-back; mere proximity of units, family relationship or some common operational features is insufficient. On the face of the notice and record, the petitioner&#039;s unit had separate registration, a separately approved rental arrangement, an excise licence, its own bank account, electricity arrangements and regular RT-12 returns. As the proposed clubbing lacked jurisdictional basis and supporting material, the show cause notice was quashed and the petitioner was held entitled to exemption in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>