https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461938 Section 32-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is described as protecting a corporate debtor's property from coercive action for offences committed before commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process once a resolution plan is approved. The text also notes that Section 238 gives the Code overriding effect over inconsistent earlier regimes, so a provisional attachment traceable to the pre-CIRP period may not survive after approval of the plan. On maintainability, it explains that the availability of an appellate remedy under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 does not necessarily bar writ scrutiny where the dispute turns on the interaction between the two statutes and the effect of Section 32-A. en-us Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 15:53:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461938 Section 32-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is described as protecting a corporate debtor's property from coercive action for offences committed before commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process once a resolution plan is approved. The text also notes that Section 238 gives the Code overriding effect over inconsistent earlier regimes, so a provisional attachment traceable to the pre-CIRP period may not survive after approval of the plan. On maintainability, it explains that the availability of an appellate remedy under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 does not necessarily bar writ scrutiny where the dispute turns on the interaction between the two statutes and the effect of Section 32-A. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461938