https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461937 Additional evidence may be admitted in appeal where the appellate court considers it necessary for a more satisfactory adjudication or to prevent an incomplete or obscure record, but the power remains discretionary and is not meant to repair a weak case. Applying that approach, the court accepted documents relevant to the issues of knowledge and fraud and allowed them to be taken on record. By contrast, a request for cross-examination at the motion stage was refused because the proceeding was decided on affidavits and no oral evidence was shown to be necessary at that interlocutory stage. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461937 Additional evidence may be admitted in appeal where the appellate court considers it necessary for a more satisfactory adjudication or to prevent an incomplete or obscure record, but the power remains discretionary and is not meant to repair a weak case. Applying that approach, the court accepted documents relevant to the issues of knowledge and fraud and allowed them to be taken on record. By contrast, a request for cross-examination at the motion stage was refused because the proceeding was decided on affidavits and no oral evidence was shown to be necessary at that interlocutory stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461937