<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43541</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 45/73-C.E. depended on the factory having an attached plant for making bamboo pulp; where no such plant existed, the benefit could not be denied merely because bamboo pulp was purchased and used from outside. The plain wording of the proviso controlled, and the interpretation that added words or relied on assumed legislative intent was rejected. The factory was therefore entitled to the exemption, and the contrary denial could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:25:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43541</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 45/73-C.E. depended on the factory having an attached plant for making bamboo pulp; where no such plant existed, the benefit could not be denied merely because bamboo pulp was purchased and used from outside. The plain wording of the proviso controlled, and the interpretation that added words or relied on assumed legislative intent was rejected. The factory was therefore entitled to the exemption, and the contrary denial could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>