https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14369 The piece examines the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 scheme that determines District, State and National Commission jurisdiction by the value of goods or services paid as consideration and analyzes the Supreme Court's reasoning that Parliament is competent to fix pecuniary limits, that consideration-based classification satisfies the Article 14 test of intelligible differentia and rational nexus, and that the statutory institutional framework including the Consumer Protection Council and the Central Consumer Protection Authority supports coordination and oversight, rendering the classification constitutionally permissible and not manifestly arbitrary. en-us Fri, 09 May 2025 09:14:36 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 09:14:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14369 The piece examines the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 scheme that determines District, State and National Commission jurisdiction by the value of goods or services paid as consideration and analyzes the Supreme Court's reasoning that Parliament is competent to fix pecuniary limits, that consideration-based classification satisfies the Article 14 test of intelligible differentia and rational nexus, and that the statutory institutional framework including the Consumer Protection Council and the Central Consumer Protection Authority supports coordination and oversight, rendering the classification constitutionally permissible and not manifestly arbitrary. Articles Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI Fri, 09 May 2025 09:14:36 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14369