<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 634 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770362</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that when excess stock is discovered during a survey under GST Act, authorities must initiate proceedings under sections 73/74, not section 130. The court quashed impugned orders that incorrectly invoked section 130 for provisional attachment, emphasizing that section 35(6) mandates tax determination through sections 73/74 for unaccounted goods. The decision reinforces statutory interpretation and adheres to established judicial precedent in GST law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 634 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770362</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that when excess stock is discovered during a survey under GST Act, authorities must initiate proceedings under sections 73/74, not section 130. The court quashed impugned orders that incorrectly invoked section 130 for provisional attachment, emphasizing that section 35(6) mandates tax determination through sections 73/74 for unaccounted goods. The decision reinforces statutory interpretation and adheres to established judicial precedent in GST law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>