https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88217 HC allowed the petition, setting aside the tax demand notice issued u/s 156 due to computational errors. The court found significant discrepancies in the Assessing Officer's (AO) tax calculation and recognized the appellate order granting exemption u/s 10(26AAB). The HC directed a fresh computation of tax liability, effectively nullifying the original demand notice and the additions made u/s 69 and 69A of the Income Tax Act. The decision fundamentally rectifies the erroneous tax assessment by mandating a comprehensive recalculation that aligns with the previously granted exemption. en-us Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:03 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88217 HC allowed the petition, setting aside the tax demand notice issued u/s 156 due to computational errors. The court found significant discrepancies in the Assessing Officer's (AO) tax calculation and recognized the appellate order granting exemption u/s 10(26AAB). The HC directed a fresh computation of tax liability, effectively nullifying the original demand notice and the additions made u/s 69 and 69A of the Income Tax Act. The decision fundamentally rectifies the erroneous tax assessment by mandating a comprehensive recalculation that aligns with the previously granted exemption. Highlights Income Tax Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88217