<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43538</link>
    <description>Where a criminal complaint for alleged excise offences was founded on the same duty liability then under challenge in pending appellate proceedings before the Tribunal, continuation of the prosecution was considered inappropriate until that appellate dispute was resolved. The Magistrate was directed to proceed only after the outcome of the Tribunal proceedings was placed before him, and the hearing of the criminal case was deferred pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43538</link>
      <description>Where a criminal complaint for alleged excise offences was founded on the same duty liability then under challenge in pending appellate proceedings before the Tribunal, continuation of the prosecution was considered inappropriate until that appellate dispute was resolved. The Magistrate was directed to proceed only after the outcome of the Tribunal proceedings was placed before him, and the hearing of the criminal case was deferred pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>