<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director&#039;s Compensation Claim Rejected: No Additional Remuneration Without Board Resolution and Insufficient Substantive Evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88200</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal involving a dispute over director&#039;s emoluments. The Appellant, initially appointed as CFO and subsequently designated as Whole-Time Director, was terminated from employment. The Tribunal held that no separate remuneration was payable for the director role, as there was no board resolution approving additional compensation. The pre-existing contractual dispute was deemed non-maintainable under the Code, with all terminal benefits already paid. The Appellant failed to substantiate claims for continued emoluments after relinquishing the CFO position, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal based on lack of documentary evidence and procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director&#039;s Compensation Claim Rejected: No Additional Remuneration Without Board Resolution and Insufficient Substantive Evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88200</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal involving a dispute over director&#039;s emoluments. The Appellant, initially appointed as CFO and subsequently designated as Whole-Time Director, was terminated from employment. The Tribunal held that no separate remuneration was payable for the director role, as there was no board resolution approving additional compensation. The pre-existing contractual dispute was deemed non-maintainable under the Code, with all terminal benefits already paid. The Appellant failed to substantiate claims for continued emoluments after relinquishing the CFO position, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal based on lack of documentary evidence and procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>