https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770305 The NCLAT partially upheld CCI's decision against Google for anti-competitive practices. The tribunal confirmed violations of Section 4(2)(a)(i) for imposing discriminatory conditions requiring mandatory use of Google Play Billing System, and Section 4(2)(e) for leveraging dominance across markets. However, it overturned findings on discriminatory pricing (Section 4(2)(a)(ii)), restriction of technical development (Section 4(2)(b)(ii)), and denial of market access (Section 4(2)(c)). The penalty was reduced from entire turnover to relevant turnover of Play Store operations, calculated at 7% of average turnover for three preceding years, totaling INR 2,166.9 crores. Several remedial directions were set aside while others were upheld. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770305 The NCLAT partially upheld CCI's decision against Google for anti-competitive practices. The tribunal confirmed violations of Section 4(2)(a)(i) for imposing discriminatory conditions requiring mandatory use of Google Play Billing System, and Section 4(2)(e) for leveraging dominance across markets. However, it overturned findings on discriminatory pricing (Section 4(2)(a)(ii)), restriction of technical development (Section 4(2)(b)(ii)), and denial of market access (Section 4(2)(c)). The penalty was reduced from entire turnover to relevant turnover of Play Store operations, calculated at 7% of average turnover for three preceding years, totaling INR 2,166.9 crores. Several remedial directions were set aside while others were upheld. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770305