<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43534</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore ruled in a case involving a refund of excise duty paid by a petitioner to the Union Government for electricity supplied for agricultural purposes. The Assistant Collector initially rejected the refund application, but the Collector of Central Excise later directed the refund. The Assistant Collector&#039;s delay in implementing the order led the petitioner to seek relief through a writ petition. The Court held that the petitioner had a legal right to claim the refund and directed the Assistant Collector to make the payment within a specified timeframe. Interest on the refund was denied, and each party was instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43534</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore ruled in a case involving a refund of excise duty paid by a petitioner to the Union Government for electricity supplied for agricultural purposes. The Assistant Collector initially rejected the refund application, but the Collector of Central Excise later directed the refund. The Assistant Collector&#039;s delay in implementing the order led the petitioner to seek relief through a writ petition. The Court held that the petitioner had a legal right to claim the refund and directed the Assistant Collector to make the payment within a specified timeframe. Interest on the refund was denied, and each party was instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>