<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 588 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770316</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Chennai set aside an adjudication order passed after an inordinate delay of nearly 13 years from the issuance of the show cause notice regarding classification of &quot;Loose Tube Optical Fibre Cables&quot; under CTH 9001 and denial of customs notification benefits. Following the Bombay HC precedent in Lanvin Synthetics case, the tribunal held that the unexplained delay by Revenue rendered the demand unsustainable, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 588 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770316</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Chennai set aside an adjudication order passed after an inordinate delay of nearly 13 years from the issuance of the show cause notice regarding classification of &quot;Loose Tube Optical Fibre Cables&quot; under CTH 9001 and denial of customs notification benefits. Following the Bombay HC precedent in Lanvin Synthetics case, the tribunal held that the unexplained delay by Revenue rendered the demand unsustainable, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>