<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 595 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770323</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s ex parte order for violating natural justice principles and section 250(6) of Income Tax Act. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present evidence regarding unexplained cash deposits and section 80C deductions. Additional evidence was admitted under Rule 29, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 595 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770323</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s ex parte order for violating natural justice principles and section 250(6) of Income Tax Act. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present evidence regarding unexplained cash deposits and section 80C deductions. Additional evidence was admitted under Rule 29, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>