https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43532 Liability for port charges on imported goods continued once clearance was permitted, because the earlier obstruction and customs dispute no longer justified indefinite protection. After 4 February 1992, the failure to remove the goods to the bonded warehouse was attributed to the writ petitioner's own negligence, so the earlier relief against port charges ceased to operate. The petitioner was therefore liable for full port charges from 4 February 1992 until the goods were cleared to the bonded warehouse. en-us Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:55:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43532 Liability for port charges on imported goods continued once clearance was permitted, because the earlier obstruction and customs dispute no longer justified indefinite protection. After 4 February 1992, the failure to remove the goods to the bonded warehouse was attributed to the writ petitioner's own negligence, so the earlier relief against port charges ceased to operate. The petitioner was therefore liable for full port charges from 4 February 1992 until the goods were cleared to the bonded warehouse. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43532