<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 605 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770333</link>
    <description>SC/Tribunal addressed penalty appeal in tax case involving cash deposits. Quantum appeal was restored for fresh adjudication due to disputed income source. Consequently, penalty proceedings were also remanded to ensure comprehensive review. The court emphasized verifying agricultural income claims and maintaining consistency in tax assessment. Penalty order was set aside, directing re-examination within 30 days with proper fact-finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 605 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770333</link>
      <description>SC/Tribunal addressed penalty appeal in tax case involving cash deposits. Quantum appeal was restored for fresh adjudication due to disputed income source. Consequently, penalty proceedings were also remanded to ensure comprehensive review. The court emphasized verifying agricultural income claims and maintaining consistency in tax assessment. Penalty order was set aside, directing re-examination within 30 days with proper fact-finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>