<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770335</link>
    <description>The AT partially allowed the appeal challenging an income tax addition under Section 69A. The tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 29,50,000 as unexplained money was incorrect, as the disputed bank deposits were not in the assessee&#039;s account. The case was remanded to the AO for verification of the assessee&#039;s contentions, with directions to pass appropriate orders after re-examining the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770335</link>
      <description>The AT partially allowed the appeal challenging an income tax addition under Section 69A. The tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 29,50,000 as unexplained money was incorrect, as the disputed bank deposits were not in the assessee&#039;s account. The case was remanded to the AO for verification of the assessee&#039;s contentions, with directions to pass appropriate orders after re-examining the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>