<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 610 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770338</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated based on information flagged under Risk Management Strategy, confirming this constitutes valid &quot;information&quot; under amended provisions effective 01.04.2021. The assessee&#039;s purchases from a supplier flagged as high-risk by GST authorities were deemed suspicious. While the CIT(A) had restricted additions under section 69C to 10% of transaction value, the ITAT further reduced this to 5% of the purchase value (Rs. 90,000 on Rs. 18,00,000), following precedents from Gujarat HC. The appeal was partly allowed, balancing revenue interests against preventing double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 610 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770338</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated based on information flagged under Risk Management Strategy, confirming this constitutes valid &quot;information&quot; under amended provisions effective 01.04.2021. The assessee&#039;s purchases from a supplier flagged as high-risk by GST authorities were deemed suspicious. While the CIT(A) had restricted additions under section 69C to 10% of transaction value, the ITAT further reduced this to 5% of the purchase value (Rs. 90,000 on Rs. 18,00,000), following precedents from Gujarat HC. The appeal was partly allowed, balancing revenue interests against preventing double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>