<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 631 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770359</link>
    <description>The HC examined challenges to a GST assessment order, focusing on limitation period, ITC entitlement, and legislative amendments. The court found the assessment order invalid due to Section 16(5) of the GST Act, which allows ITC claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 if returns were filed by 30.11.2021. The order was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh assessment, granting the petitioner ITC despite delayed filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 631 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770359</link>
      <description>The HC examined challenges to a GST assessment order, focusing on limitation period, ITC entitlement, and legislative amendments. The court found the assessment order invalid due to Section 16(5) of the GST Act, which allows ITC claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 if returns were filed by 30.11.2021. The order was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh assessment, granting the petitioner ITC despite delayed filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>